Evangelical Expatriate
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • Books
  • Videos
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • Books
  • Videos






On the brokenness of Western cultural self-evaluation

6/10/2015

0 Comments

 
Liberal evangelical personality Tony Campolo recently shocked no one by formally announcing his approval of monogamous gay marriage, coupled with a plea that other Christians do the same. A more surprising similar announcement came almost simultaneously from former Christianity Today editor David Neff on Facebook. The latter put conservative Evangelical "thought leaders" on social media into a relative state of disarray, and Christianity Today issued a response to the whole ordeal aptly titled, "Breaking news: 2 billion Christians believe in traditional marriage."
It's worth reading both Campolo's announcement and CT's response. However there's a disconnect between the two, in that while Campolo makes an essentially emotional and cultural appeal, CT responds primarily with theology. As appropriate and important as such a theological response is, there's a problem with Campolo's reasoning--and hence the reasoning of the larger Christian community that has become sympathetic to gay marriage--that goes untouched. Although the title of the CT article hints at the problem, the writer doesn't expound on it in his piece. That problem is the narrow, cyclical nature of Campolo and Company's "cultural" self-evaluation.

Picture
The late Orthodox priest and seminary dean Fr. Alexander Schmemann had some thoughts about Western cultural self-evaluation when once asked about the Episcopal Church's then burgeoning controversy over the priestly ordination of women. Though the provoking issue was different, his observations about typical Western reasoning on these issues has relevance for today's latest cultural flash point of gay marriage. Here's an excerpt below, in which I've replaced every mention of "women's ordination" with "gay marriage," so as to bring Schmemann's point about the overall Western mindset into better focus without distracting on the topic of women's ordination (emphases my own).


The debate on [gay marriage] reveals something which we have suspected for a long time but which now is confirmed beyond any doubt: the total, truly built-in indifference of the Christian West to anything beyond the sphere of its own problematics, of its own experience. I can only repeat here what I have said before: even the so-called "ecumenical movement," notwithstanding its claims to the contrary, has always been, and still is, a purely Western phenomenon, based on Western presuppositions and determined by a specifically Western agenda. This is not "pride" or "arrogance." On the contrary, the Christian West is almost obsessed with a guilt complex and enjoys nothing better than self-criticism and self condemnation. It is rather a total inability to transcend itself, to accept the simple idea that its own experience, problems, thought forms and priorities may not be universal, that they themselves may need to be evaluated and judged in the light of a truly universal, truly "Catholic" experience. Western Christians would almost enthusiastically judge and condemn themselves, but on their own terms and within their own hopelessly "Western" perspective. Thus when they decide -- on the basis of their own "cultural situation" -- that they must "repair" injustices to [gay and lesbian persons], they plan to do it immediately without even asking what the "others" may think about it, and are sincerely amazed and even saddened by the lack on the part of these "others" of ecumenical spirit, sympathy, and comprehension.

To me, the debate on
[gay marriage] seems to be provincial, deeply marked, and even determined by Western self-centeredness and self-sufficiency, by a naive, almost childish, conviction that every "trend" in the Western culture justifies a radical rethinking of the entire Christian tradition. How many such "trends" we have witnessed during the last decades of our troubled century! How many corresponding "theologies!" The difference this time, however, is that one deals in this particular debate not with a passing intellectual and academic "fad" like "death of God," "secular city," "celebration of life," etc.-- which, after it has produced a couple of ephemeral best-sellers, simply disappears, but with the threat of an irreversible and irreparable act which, if it becomes reality, will produce a new, and this time, I am convinced, final division among Christians, and will signify, at least for the Orthodox, the end of all dialogues.

It is well known that the advocates of
[gay marriage] explain the Scriptural and the traditional [treatment of marriage] by "cultural conditioning." If Christ did not [speak on gay marriage], if the Church for centuries did not [embrace gay marriage], it is because of "culture" which would have made it impossible and unthinkable then. It is not my purpose to discuss here the theological and exegetical implications of this view as well as its purely historical basis, which incidentally seems to me extremely weak and shaky. What is truly amazing is that while absolutely convinced that they understand past "cultures," the advocates of [gay marriage] seem to be totally unaware of their own "cultural conditioning," of their own surrender to culture.

Personally, I would expect Schmemann's angle on these issues to be a non-starter with a culture so deeply and hopelessly obsessed with itself as ours. But it would behoove historically grounded Christians engaging culture on gay marriage not to concede the purity of the Western moral guilt complex at the outset. Two billion Christians would appreciate it.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Abortion
    Apologetics
    Autobiographical
    Calendar
    Culture
    Easter
    Evangelicalism
    Faith
    History
    Icons
    Lent
    Liturgy
    Pascha
    Politics
    Pop Culture
    Prayer
    Saints
    Social Media
    Spirituality
    Theology

    Archives

    August 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    January 2020
    July 2019
    May 2019
    September 2018
    August 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    June 2017
    February 2017
    July 2016
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    December 2014
    September 2014

    RSS Feed

    Orthodox Miscellany

    Orthodox Intro
    Ancient Faith Publishing
    ​St. Vlad's Seminary Press
    St. Tikhon's Monastery Press
    ​
    New Rome Press
    Orthodoxy and Heterodoxy

    Roads from Emmaus
    Fr Patrick Henry Reardon
    ​Orthodox Synaxis

    Orthodox-Reformed Bridge
    Everyday Asceticism

    Lux Christi
    Orthodox Arts Journal
    Pageau Carvings
    Glory to God for All Things

    Classical Christianity
    The Music Stand
    The Whole Counsel Blog
    Molly Sabourin
    Theoria

    Paracletos Monastery Icons
    Antiochian Archdiocese
    Orthodox Church in America
    ​The Orthodox West
    Assembly of Bishops
    ​St. Tikhon's Seminary
    St Vladimir's Seminary
    Trinity College
    St. Basil Center
    Orthodox Christians for Life
    FOCUS North America
    Orthodox Volunteer Corps

    Project Mexico
    ​Burning Bush Coffee

    Politikos

    The American Commons
    The ASP
    FairVote

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.